Skip to main content
SearchLoginLogin or Signup
Published on Jan 14, 2023

Complete Alphabetical List of References

Published onJan 14, 2023
Complete Alphabetical List of References
·

A

  • Academia.edu. n.d. “Share Research.” Academia.edu. Accessed 4 June 2021. https://www.academia.edu/

  • Adema, Janneke, et al. 2015. Really, We’re Helping To Build This . . . Business: The Academia.edu Files. Liquid Books. http://liquidbooks.pbworks.com/w/page/106236504/The%20Academia_edu%20Files

  • ———. 2016. “Responsible Enterprise: Don’t Give Commercial Operations Free Labour.” Liquid Books. http://liquidbooks.pbworks.com/w/page/106882533/Don%E2%80%99t%20Give%20Your%20Labour%20To%20Academia_edu%20Use%20It%20To%20Strengthen%20The%20Academic%20Commons

  • African Copyright & Access to Knowledge Project. 2016. “African Commons Project.” African Copyright & Access to Knowledge Project. https://www.idrc.ca/en/project/african-copyright-and-access-knowledge-network-aca2k. Archived at https://perma.cc/V5FX-SHXY

  • Ahmed, Allam. 2007. “Open Access Towards Bridging the Digital Divide - Policies and Strategies for Developing Countries.” Information Technology for Development 13 (4): 337–61.

  • Akers, Katherine G., and Jennifer Doty. 2013. “Disciplinary Differences in Faculty Research Data Management Practices and Perspectives.” International Journal of Digital Curation 8 (2): 5–26.

  • Albornoz, Denisse, et al. 1998. “Can Open Scholarly Practices Redress Epistemic Injustice?” Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access, edited by Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray, 65–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Anderson, Charles. 1998. “Universal Access—Free and Open Access—It Depends.” Reference & User Services Quarterly 38 (1): 25–27.

  • Ang, Ien. 2005. “Who Needs Cultural Research?” Cultural Studies and Practical Politics: Theory, Coalition Building, and Social Activism, edited by P. Leystina, 477–83. Blackwell.

  • Arbuckle, Alyssa. 2016. Introduction to Scholarly and Research Communication 10 (2). Special Issue: Canada’s Education Journals.

  • ———. 2019. “Opportunities for Social Knowledge Creation in the Digital Humanities.” Doing More Digital Humanities, edited by Constance Crompton et al., 290–300. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429353048-20

  • Asmah, Josephine. 2014. International Policy and Practice on Open Access for Monographs. Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences. http://www.ideas-idees.ca/sites/default/files/aspp-oa-appendix.pdf

  • Ayris, Paul, et al. 2014. “Open Access in UCL: A New Paradigm for London’s Global University in Research Support.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries 45 (4): 282–95.

B

  • Bauer, Florian, and Martin Kaltenbock. n.d. Linked Open Data: The Essentials. DGS—Druck- u. Graphikservice GmbH. http://bls.buu.ac.th/~f55361/08Aug22/LOD/EBFFFd01.pdf

  • Behbehanian, Laleh, and Michael Burawoy. 2014. “Appendix: Global Pedagogy in a Digital Age.” Current Sociology 62 (2): 285–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113515799

  • Benkler, Yochai. 2003. “Freedom in the Commons: Towards a Political Economy of Information.” Duke Law Journal 52 (6): 1245–76.

  • ———. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Bennett, W. Lance, ed. 2008. Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Bhardwaj, Raj Kumar. 2017. “Academic Social Networking Sites: Comparative Analysis of ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley and Zotero.” Information and Learning Science 118 (5/6): 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-03-2017-0012

  • Björk, Bo-Christer. 2004. “Open Access to Scientific Publications—an Analysis of the Barriers to Change?” Information Research 9 (2).

  • Bollier, David. 2002. “The Enclosure of the Academic Commons.” Academe 88 (5): 18–22. , https://doi.org/10.2307/40252215

  • ———. 2006. “The Growth of the Commons Paradigm.” Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, edited by Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom, 27–40. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uvic/detail.action?docID=3338502

  • Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Cristina Rossi. 2003. “Why Open Source Software Can Succeed.” Research Policy 32 (7): 1243–58.

  • Borgman, Christine L. 2007. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Bowdon, Melody A., and Russell G. Carpenter. 2011. Higher Education, Emerging Technologies, and Community Partnerships: Concepts, Models and Practices. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 1AD. http://www.igi-global.com/gateway/book/47442

  • Boyle, James. 2008. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Brennan, Sheila A. 2016. “Public, First.” Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, edited by Matthew K. Gold and Lauren F. Klein, 384–90. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/83

  • Broekman, Pauline van Mourik, et al. 2014. Open Education: A Study in Disruption. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Brown, Susan. 2016. “Towards Best Practices in Collaborative Online Knowledge Production.” In Doing Digital Humanities: Practice, Training, Research, edited by Constance Crompton et al., 47–64. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

  • Bruns, Axel. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

  • Burdick, Anne, et al. 2012. “The Social Life of the Digital Humanities.” Digital_Humanities, edited by Anne Burdick et al., 73–99. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Burg, Jacob. 2000. “Pedagogy of and for the Public: Imagining the Intersection of Public Humanities and Community Literacy.” Community Literacy Journal 14 (2): 130–37.

  • Burke, Peter. 2000. A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot, Based on the First Series of Vonhoff Lectures given at the University of Groningen (Netherlands). Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press; Blackwell Publishers.

  • ———. 2012. A Social History of Knowledge. II: From the Encyclopédie to Wikipedia. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

  • Bush, Vannevar. 1945. “As We May Think.” The Atlantic (1 July). https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/

C

  • Canadian Association of Research Libraries. n.d. “Open Access.” Canadian Association of Research Libraries. Accessed 22 Feb. 2017. http://www.carl-abrc.ca/advancing-research/scholarly-communication/open-access/

  • Canadian Humanities and Social Sciences Commons. n.d. Homepage of Hsscommons. Accessed 16 July 2021. https://hsscommons.ca/

  • Cao, Qilin, et al. 2013. “The Roles of Bridging and Bonding in Social Media Communities.” Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (8): 1671–81.

  • Chambers, Ephraim. 1728. Cyclopædia: Or, An Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences. London: Ephraim Chambers.

  • Chan, Leslie. 2004. “Supporting and Enhancing Scholarship in the Digital Age.” Canadian Journal of Communication 29 (3): 277–300.

  • ———. 2019. “Open Infrastructure: From Monocultures to Bibliodiversity.” Introduction to Connecting the Knowledge Commons—From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure, edited by Leslie Chan and Pierre Mounier. Marseille: OpenEdition Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.oep.9050

  • Chang, Yu-Wei. 2015. “Librarians’ Contribution to Open Access Journal Publishing in Library and Information Science from the Perspective of Authorship.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 41 (5): 660–68.

  • Coonin, Bryna, and Leigh Younce. 2009. “Publishing in Open Access Journals in The Social Sciences and Humanities: Who’s Doing It and Why.” ACRL Fourteenth National Conference. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/seattle/papers/85.pdf

  • Creative Commons. n.d. “When We Share, Everyone Wins.” Creative Commons. Accessed 25 July 2021. https://creativecommons.org/

  • Croxton, Rebecca A. “E-Learning in the Digital Humanities.” Routledge International Handbook of Research Methods in Digital Humanities, edited by Kristen Schuster and Stuart Dunn, 384–98. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429777028-27

  • CUNY Academic Commons. n.d. Homepage. Accessed 16 July 2021. https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/

  • Cuthill, Michael. 2012. “A ‘Civic Mission’ for the University: Engaged Scholarship and Community-Based Participatory Research.” Higher Education and Civic Engagement: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Lorraine McIlrath et al., 81–99. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

D

  • Davis, Rebecca Frost, et al. 2020. “Curating Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities.” Humanities Commons. Modern Language Association. https://doi.org/10.17613/55a0-am43

  • De Angelis, Massimo, and David Harvie. 2013. “The Commons.” The Routledge Companion to Alternative Organization, edited by Martin Parker et al., 280–94. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203725351-23

  • De Carvalho, Carlos, et al. 2012. “Wikimarks: An Approach Proposition for Generating Collaborative, Structured Content from Social Networking Sharing on the Web.” 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC ‘12), 95–98.

  • Derrida, Jacques, and Eric Prenowitz. 1995. Mal d’Archive: Une Impression Freudienne (Translated in English as Archive Fever). Paperback ed., [Nachdr.]. Paris; Chicago, IL: Éditions Galilée.

  • Diderot, Denis, and Jean le Ronde d’Alembert. 1751. Encyclopédie, Ou Dictionnaire Raisonné Des Sciences, Des Arts et Des Métiers (English: Encyclopedia, or a Systematic Dictionary of the Sciences, Arts, and Crafts). Paris; Chicago, IL: André le Breton, Michel-Antoine David, Laurent Durand, and Antoine-Claude Briasson.

  • Digital Citizens Alliance. 2017. “Trouble in Our Digital Midst: How Digital Platforms Are Being Overrun by Bad Actors and How the Internet Community Can Beat Them at Their Own Game” (June). https://www.digitalcitizensalliance.org/clientuploads/directory/Reports/Trouble-in-Our%20Digital-Midst%20Report-June-2017.pdf

  • Duffy, Brooke Erin, and Jefferson D. Pooley. 2017. “‘Facebook for Academics’: The Convergence of Self-Branding and Social Media Logic on Academia.edu.” Social Media + Society 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117696523

  • Dyer, Harry T. 2017. “Interactivity, Social Media, and Superman: How Comic Books Can Help Us Understand and Conceptualize Interactivity Online.” Digital Sociologies, edited by Jessie Daniels et al., 77–101. Bristol: Policy Press.

E

F

  • Fear, Kathleen. 2011. “‘You Made It, You Take Care of It’: Data Management as Personal Information Management.” International Journal of Digital Curation 6 (2): 53–77.

  • Feller, Joseph, and Brian Fitzgerald. 2002. Understanding Open Source Software Development. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co.

  • Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. 2015. “Academia, Not Edu.” Really, We’re Helping To Build This . . . Business: The Academia.edu Files. Liquid Books. http://liquidbooks.pbworks.com/w/page/106236504/The%20Academia_edu%20Files

  • ———. 2019. Generous Thinking: A Radical Approach to Saving the University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Fortney, Katie, and Justin Gonder. 2015. “A Social Networking Site Is Not an Open Access Repository.” Really, We’re Helping To Build This . . . Business: The Academia.edu Files. Liquid Books. http://liquidbooks.pbworks.com/w/page/106236504/The%20Academia_edu%20Files

G

  • Geek Feminism Wiki. n.d. “Mitigating Internet Trollstorms.” Geek Feminism Wiki. Accessed 4 Feb. 2021. https://geekfeminism.wikia.org/wiki/Mitigating_internet_trollstorms

  • Geltner, G. 2015. “Upon Leaving Academia.edu.” Mittelalter. Interdisziplinäre Forschung und Rezeptionsgeschichte. https://mittelalter.hypotheses.org/7123

  • GitHub. 2013. “GitHub.” GitHub. https://github.com

  • Glass, Chris R., and Hiram E. Fitzgerald. 2010. “Engaged Scholarship: Historical Roots, Contemporary Challenges.” Institutional Change, edited by Hiram E. Fitzgerald et al., vol. 1, 9–24. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

  • Glass, Erin R. 2018. “Engaging the Knowledge Commons: Setting Up Virtual Participatory Spaces for Academic Collaboration and Community.” Digital Humanities, Libraries, and Partnerships: A Critical Examination of Labor, Networks, and Community, edited by Robin Kear and Kate Joranson, Kent, UK: Elsevier Science & Technology. 100–15.

  • Gold, Matthew. 2011. “Beyond Friending: BuddyPress and the Social, Networked, Open-Source Classroom.” CUNY Academic Works. Publications and Research, CUNY Graduate Center. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_pubs/291

  • Gold, Matthew K. 2012. “Looking for Whitman: A Multi-Campus Experiment in Digital Pedagogy.” Digital Humanities Pedagogy: Practices, Principles and Politics, edited by Brett D. Hirsch, 151–76. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0024.07

  • Gold, Matthew, and George Otte. 2011. “The CUNY Academic Commons: Fostering Faculty Use of the Social Web.” On the Horizon 19 (1): 24–32.https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111107681

  • Goodwin, Spencer, et al. 2014. “Changing Communication on ResearchGate through Interface Updates.” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 51 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101129.

  • Government of Canada. 2015. Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications. http://www.science.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=F6765465-1

  • Green, Cable. 2017. “Open Licensing and Open Education Licensing Policy.” Open: The Philosophy and Practices That Are Revolutionizing Education and Science, edited by Rajiv S. Jhangiani and Robert Biswas-Diener, 29–41. London: Ubiquity Press.

  • Guédon, Jean-Claude. 2008. “Digitizing and the Meaning of Knowledge.” Academic Matters (November): 23–26.

H

  • Hall, Gary. 2015. “What Does Academia.edu’s Success Mean for Open Access?” Really, We’re Helping To Build This . . . Business: The Academia.edu Files. Liquid Books. http://liquidbooks.pbworks.com/w/page/106422609/What%20does%20Academia_edu%E2%80%99s%20success%20mean%20for%20Open%20Access

  • Hart, A., and D. Wolff. 2006. “Developing Communities of Practice Through Community-University Partnerships.” Planning Practice and Research 21 (1): 121–38.

  • Hart, Jennefer, et al. 2008. “Exploring the Facebook Experience: A New Approach to Usability.” Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) International Conference, 471–74. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

  • Heath, Malcolm, et al. 2008. “E-Publication and Open Access in the Arts and Humanities in the UK.” Ariadne 54. Archived at https://perma.cc/NKM4-E3T5

  • Hensher, Martin, et al. 2020. “Open Knowledge Commons versus Privatized Gain in a Fractured Information Ecology: Lessons from COVID-19 for the Future of Sustainability.” Global Sustainability 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.21

  • Henty, Margaret, et al. 2008. “Investigating Data Management Practices in Australian Universities.” APSR. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/14549/1/14549.pdf

  • Hiebert, Matthew, et al. 2015. “Implementing a Social Knowledge Creation Environment.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n3a223

  • Hsu, Wendy F. 2016. “Lessons on Public Humanities from the Civic Sphere.” Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, edited by Matthew K. Gold and Lauren F. Klein, 280–86. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/75

  • Huang, Ronghuai, et al. 2020. “Disrupted Classes, Undisrupted Learning during COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Application of Open Educational Practices and Resources.” Smart Learning Environments 7 (1): 19.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00125-8

  • Humanities Commons. n.d. “Humanities Commons—Open Access, Open Source, Open to All.” Accessed 4 June 2021. https://hcommons.org/

I

J

  • Jay, Gregory. “The Engaged Humanities: Principles and Practices of Public Scholarship and Teaching.” Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship 3 (1): 51–63.

  • Jones, Christopher. 2015a. “Institutional Supports for Openness.” Networked Learning: An Educational Paradigm for the Age of Digital Networks, 124–26. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-01934-5.pdf

  • ———. 2015b. “Openness, Open Educational Resources and the University.” Networked Learning: An Educational Paradigm for the Age of Digital Networks, 120–24. Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-01934-5.pdf

  • Jones, Steven E. 2014. “Publications.” The Emergence of the Digital Humanities, 147–77. New York: Routledge.

  • Joranson, Kate. 2008. “Indigenous Knowledge and the Knowledge Commons.” International Information & Library Review 40 (1): 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2008.10762763

  • Jordan, Katy. 2014. “Academics and Their Online Networks: Exploring the Role of Academic Social Networking Sites.” First Monday (October). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i11.4937

  • ———. 2019. “From Social Networks to Publishing Platforms: A Review of the History and Scholarship of Academic Social Network Sites.” Frontiers in Digital Humanities 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2019.00005

  • Jordan, Mary Wilkins. 2015. “Public Library History on the Lewis and Clark Trail.” Public Library Quarterly 34 (2): 162–77.

  • Joy, Eileen A. 2015. “Open Letter to Rosemary Feal, Kathleen Fitzpatrick, and the Modern Language Association.” Santa Barbara: Punctum Books. Accessed 19 Feb. 2019. https://punctumbooks.com/blog/open-letter-to-modern-language-association/

K

  • Kelty, Christopher M. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389002

  • Keskin, Nilgün Özdamar, et al. 2018. “National Strategies for OER and MOOCs From 2010 to 2020: Canada, Japan, South Korea, Turkey, UK, and USA.” Administrative Leadership in Open and Distance Learning Programs, 188–212. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2645-2.ch008

  • King, Monty, et al. 2018. “MOOCs and OER in the Global South: Problems and Potential.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19 (5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3742

  • Kitchin, Rob, et al. 2015. “Funding Models for Open Access Digital Data Repositories.” Online Information Review 39 (5): 664–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2015-0031

  • Kogut, Bruce, and Anca Metiu. 2001. “Open-Source Software Development and Distributed Innovation.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17 (2): 248–64.

  • Kondratova, Irina, and Ilia Goldfarb. 2004. “Virtual Communities of Practice: Design for Collaboration and Knowledge Creation.” Proceedings of the European Conference on Products and Processes Modelling.

  • Kranich, Nancy. 2006. “Countering Enclosure: Reclaiming the Knowledge Commons.” Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, edited by Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom, 85–122. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uvic/detail.action?docID=3338502

  • Krier, Laura, and Carly A. Strasser. 2013. Data Management for Libraries: A Lita Guide. Chicago: ALA TechSource.

L

  • Lane, Richard J. 2014. “Innovation through Tradition: New Scholarly Publishing Applications Modelled on Faith-Based Electronic Publishing & Learning Environments.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/188

  • Levine, Peter. 2002. “Building the Electronic Commons.” The Good Society 11 (3)” 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1353/gso.2003.0008

  • Liu, Alan. 2011. “Friending the Past: The Sense of History and Social Computing.” New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation 42 (1): 1–30.

  • ———. 2012. “Where Is Cultural Criticism in the Digital Humanities?” Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 490–509. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Local Contexts. n.d. “TK Labels.” Local Contexts. Accessed 25 July 2021. https://localcontexts.org/labels/traditional-knowledge-labels/

  • Lorimer, Rowland. 2014. “A Good Idea, a Difficult Reality: Toward a Publisher/Library Open Access Partnership.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/180

  • Lovett, Julia, et al. 2017. “Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 5 (1): eP2183. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162–3309.2183https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2183

M

  • Madison, Michael J., et al. 2019. “Knowledge Commons.” Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons, edited by Blake Hudson et al., 76–90. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315162782-7

  • Martin, Shawn. 2019. “Historicizing the Knowledge Commons: Open Access, Technical Knowledge, and the Industrial Application of Science.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 3 (February): 23. https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.16

  • Maxwell, John. 2015. “Beyond Open Access to Open Content.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/202

  • McGrath, Jim. 2020. “Teaching Digital Public Humanities with the Public Library.” Doing Public Humanities, edited by Susan Smulyan, 39–54. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003058038-3

  • McLuhan, Marshall. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. University of Toronto Press. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/428949

  • McMillan Cottom, Tressie. 2015. “‘Who Do You Think You Are?’: When Marginality Meets Academic Microcelebrity.” https://doi.org/10.7264/N3319T5T

  • McPherson, Tara. 2012. “Why Are the Digital Humanities so White? Or Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation.” Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/29

  • Meadows, Alice. 2015. “Beyond Open: Expanding Access to Scholarly Content.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (3). http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0018.301?view=text;rgn=main

  • Meishar-Tal, Hagit, and Efrat Pieterse. 2017. “Why Do Academics Use Academic Social Networking Sites?” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2643

  • Mendeley. 2021. “Reference Management Software & Researcher Network.” Mendeley. Accessed 28 July 2021. https://www.mendeley.com/?interaction_required=true

  • Molloy, Jennifer. 2011. “The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science.” PLOS Biology 9 (12): 1–4.

  • Morrison, Aimée. 2018. “Of, By, and For the Internet: New Media Studies and Public Scholarship.” The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities, edited by Jentery Sayers, 56–66. New York: Routledge.

  • Morrison, Heather, et al. 2010. Require Open Access to Results of Research Funded by Canadian Taxpayer. http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/028.nsf/eng/00352.html

N

O

  • Okune, Angela, et al. 2019. “Whose Infrastructure? Towards Inclusive and Collaborative Knowledge Infrastructures in Open Science.” Connecting the Knowledge Commons — From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure: The 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing—Revised Selected Papers, edited by Leslie Chan and Pierre Mounier. Marseille: OpenEdition Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.oep.9050

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2015. “Making Open Science a Reality.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 25: n.p. DOI: 10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en

  • Ossewaarde, Marinus, and Wessel Reijers. 2017. “The Illusion of the Digital Commons: ‘False Consciousness’ in Online Alternative Economies.” Organization 24 (5): 609–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417713217

  • Ossiannilsson, Ebba. 2021. “Some Challenges for Universities, in a Post Crisis, as Covid-19.” Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context: COVID-19 as an Opportunity for Global Learning, edited by Daniel Burgos et al., 99–112. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_7

  • Ovadia, Steven. 2014. “ResearchGate and Academia.edu: Academic Social Networks.” Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 33 (3): 165–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2014.934093

P

R

S

  • Saklofske, Jon, and INKE Research Group. 2016. “Digital Theoria, Poiesis, and Praxis: Activating Humanities Research and Communication through Open Social Scholarship Platform Design.” Scholarly and Research Communication 7 (2/3). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/252

  • Shearer, Kathleen. 2011. Comprehensive Brief to Open Access to Publications and Research Data for the Federal Granting Agencies. http://www.science.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=2360F10C-1

  • Shen, Chien-wen, and Chin-Jin Kuo. 2015. “Learning in Massive Open Online Courses: Evidence from Social Media Mining.” Computers in Human Behavior 51 (October): 568–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.066

  • Siemens, Lynne. 2009. “INKE Administrative Structure, Omnibus Document.” New Knowledge Environments 1 (1). https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/INKE/article/view/546

  • ———. 2012a (March). “Understanding Long-Term Collaboration: Reflections on Year 1 and Before.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2012v3n1a48

  • ———. 2012b (April). “Firing on All Cylinders: Progress and Transition in INKE’s Year 2.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3 (4). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/72

  • ———. 2013. “Responding to Change and Transition in INKE’s Year 3.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4 (3). https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2013v4n3a115

  • ———. 2014. “Research Collaboration as ‘Layers of Engagement’: INKE in Year Four.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4). https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2014v5n4a181

  • Siemens, Lynne, and INKE Research Group. 2016. “‘Faster Alone, Further Together’: Reflections on INKE’s Year Six.” Scholarly and Research Communication 7 (2/3). https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2016v7n2/3a250

  • Siemens, Ray. 2002. “Scholarly Publishing at Its Source, and at Present.” Introduction to The Credibility of Electronic Publishing: A Report to the Humanities and Social Sciences Federation of Canada. 1–128.

  • Siemens, Ray, Alex Garnett, Corrina Koolen, Cara Leitch, Meagan Timney, and ETCL, INKE, and PKP Research Groups. 2012. “‘Toward Modeling the Social Edition: An Approach to Understanding the Electronic Scholarly Edition in the Context of New and Emerging Social Media.’” Literary and Linguistic Computing 27 (4): 445–61.

  • Slashdot Media. 2013. “SourceForge.” SourceForge. http://sourceforge.net

  • Snijder, Ronald. 2015. “Better Sharing Through Licenses? Measuring the Influence of Creative Commons Licenses on the Usage of Open Access Monographs.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 3 (1): 1187. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1187

  • Suber, Peter. 2005. “Promoting Open Access in the Humanities.” Syllecta Classica 16: 231–46.

  • ———. 2006. “Creating an Intellectual Commons through Open Access.” Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, edited by Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom, 171–208. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

T

V

  • Van Allen, Jennifer, and Stacy Katz. 2020. “Teaching with OER during Pandemics and Beyond.” Journal for Multicultural Education 14 (3/4): 209–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-04-2020-0027

  • Veletsianos, George. 2015. “A Case Study of Scholars’ Open and Sharing Practices.” Open Praxis 7 (3): 199–209.

  • ———. 2016. Social Media in Academia: Networked Scholars. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742298

  • ———. 2021. “Open Educational Resources: Expanding Equity or Reflecting and Furthering Inequities?” Educational Technology Research and Development 69 (1): 407–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09840-y

  • Veletsianos, George, and Royce Kimmons. 2012. “Networked Participatory Scholarship: Emergent Techno-Cultural Pressures toward Open and Digital Scholarship in Online Networks.” Computers & Education 58 (2): 766–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.001

  • Von Krogh, Georg, and Eric Von Hippel. 2006. “The Promise of Research on Open Source Software.” Management Science 52 (7): 975–83.

W

  • Weber, Steven. 2004. The Success of Open Source. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Weinhardt, Justin M., and Traci Sitzmann. 2019. “Revolutionizing Training and Education? Three Questions Regarding Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs).” Human Resource Management Review 29 (2): 218–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.06.004

  • Wikipedia Foundation. 2019. About page, Wikipedia. About:Wikipedia

  • Wiley, David, and John Hilton. 2018. “Defining OER-Enabled Pedagogy.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19 (4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601

  • Wilkinson, Mark D., et al. 2016. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship.” Scientific Data 3 (1): 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

  • Willinsky, John. 2006. The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Wilson, James A. J., et al. 2011. “An Institutional Approach to Developing Research Data Management Infrastructure.” International Journal of Digital Curation 6 (2): 274–87. http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/198

  • Winter, Caroline, et al. 2020. “Foundations for the Canadian Humanities and Social Sciences Commons: Exploring the Possibilities of Digital Research Communities.” Pop! Public. Open. Participatory 2 (October). https://popjournal.ca/issue02/winter

  • Wonders, Brooke J., et al. 2012. “Information Sampling and Linking: Reality Hunger and the Digital Knowledge Commons.” Contemporary Social Science 7 (3): 247–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2012.683447

  • Woodward, Kathleen. 2009. “The Future of the Humanities in the Present & in Public.” Daedalus 138 (1): 110–23.

Z

  • Zhang, Ke, et al., eds. 2015. MOOCs and Open Education in the Global South: Challenges, Successes, and Opportunities. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398919

  • Zheng, Ye, and Yu Li. 2015. “University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study.” Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 3 (1): 1–29.

 

License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
Comments
0
?
Login to discuss
comment
No comments here
Why not start the discussion?
Open Scholarship Press
Published with